Additional information to the sections

Defining material topics

GRI 3‑1

Approach to defining material topics

In 2022 and 2023, PhosAgro Group revised the Regulations on Collecting, Processing and Presenting Non‑Financial Reporting Data in accordance with GRI standards, including the GRI Universal Standards updated in 2021. The Regulations include GRI‑compliant data collection forms for the Report and establish approach to defining material topics based on double materiality. This approach relies on the review of the impact that social, economic, regulatory and governance and/or environmental factors or aspects have on the Company and vice versa.

In 2023, the Company added the following new sources of information to the materiality analysis process: feedback and comments received during the RSPP public assurance process, as well as opinions of external experts on the quality of the Company’s reports and its compliance with the best market practices, in particular, opinions of experts from Telegram channels.

In 2024, the Company determined financial materiality: it assessed the potential impact of strategic risks on its activities (weight 80%) and the international ESG rating (weight 20%) and, by comparing the two lists, identified the highest priority topics: the most significant impacts and the highest risks (double materiality).

The Group compared material topics against its strategic priorities and risk profile. The impact of material aspects on our value chain from mine to plate (for more information, see the Business Model section on page 21‑23) was rated as high, medium or low. When assessing the degree of impact on processes under our control such as product development and manufacturing, purchase and mining of mineral resources, logistics and sales, we took into account the scale of an actual and potential impact and the nature of the assessed topic with due regard to industry specifics. With the application of our products seen as an important stage in value creation, we assessed the effect of this element on the selection of material topics by analysing both the Company’s impact on the end consumer and customer needs, expectations and requirements with regard to our products and practices.

To illustrate our approach to impact assessment, let us look at the GRI 404 Training and Education. For this topic, we rated the impact as high at every stage of the value chain due to an important role our highly qualified staff plays along the way from product development to sales. As regards the application stage, we assume that the customer gets a 2‑in‑1 product, including a fertilizer and our service expertise (training, agronomic advice and support). Employees are also directly interested in improving their professional qualifications as a means of facilitating their career development in the Company and obtaining a competitive edge in the labour market. Personal development tools help employees to harmoniously develop their skills in other areas of interest. Hence, relevant competencies and skills acquired, in particular, as part of the provided training are highly relevant.

Key aspects of 2024 reporting that deserve a special mention

  1. Material topics disclosed in the 2023 Annual Report are still relevant in 2024.
  2. To assess them, we applied a double materiality principle.
  3. 45 GRI indicators underwent external independent audit by Technologies of Trust – Audit JSC providing limited assurance.

Notably, we did not receive any communications from stakeholders via the hot line and email (esg@phosagro.ru and ir@phosagro.ru) in 2024.

Material topics Corresponding GRI standard Impact on the value chain Average score (impact materiality) Risks Related risks UN SDGs
Product development Mineral resources Production Logistics Sales Application
1 Economic impact 201 Economic performance H H H H H M 4.80 3.43 Strategic planning, production, project, sanctions, interest rate, credit, currency risks
2 Share capital 201 Economic performance H H H M H L 4.80 3.43 Strategic planning, production, project, sanctions, interest rate, credit, currency risks
3 Climate 305 Emissions H H H M M H 4.76 3.33 Climate, environmental, regulatory risks
4 Air 305 Emissions H H H M M H 4.76 3.33 Climate, environmental, regulatory risks
5 Industrial safety 403 Occupational health and safety H H H H H H 4.67 4 HR, health and safety, infectious diseases risks
6 Waste 306 Waste M H H L H H 4.67 3 Environmental, regulatory risks
7 Energy efficiency 302 Energy M H H M L L 4.65 3.5 Production, climate risks
8

Contributing to local communities

Economic impact

203 Indirect economic impacts L L H H H H 4.54 4 Failure to deliver on SDGs and ESG, climate, sanctions risks
9 Supply chain 204 Procurement practices L H H H H L 4.43 3.67 Commodity, corruption, sanctions risks
10 Water 303 Water and waste water H H H L L H 4.43 3 Production, climate risks
11

Personnel development and human rights

Economic impact

202 Market presence H M M M H H 4.40 4.5 Strategic planning, sanctions risks
12 ESG evaluation of suppliers 308 Supplier environmental assessment L H H H L L 4.35 3 Failure to deliver on SDGs and ESG, climate, sanctions risks
13 Biodiversity 304 Biodiversity H H H L L H 4.33 3 Production, climate risks
Double Personnel development and human rights 402 Labour/management relations H H H H H L 4.31 3.5 HR, business process risks
Double Contributing to local communities 413 Local communities M H H L L H 4.31 3 Social risks
14 Employment 401 Employment H H H H H M 4.18 3 Social, HR risks
Double Personnel development and human rights 405 Diversity and equal opportunity H M H M H H 4.12 3 HR, business process risks
15 Motivation and training 404 Training and education H H H H H H 4.05 3 HR, business process risks
ESG evaluation of suppliers 414 Supplier social assessment L H H H L L 4.01 3 Failure to deliver on SDGs and ESG, climate, environmental risks
16 Anti‑corruption 205 Anti‑corruption H H H H H H 3.96 2 Corruption risks
17 Anti‑competitive behaviour 206 Anti‑competitive behaviour H H H H H H 3.96 2 Reputational risks
18 Tax policy 207 Taxes L H H L H L 3.81 3 Tax risk
19 Information security 410 Security practices H H H M M M 3.75 2.5 Information and economic security risks
20 Product management 417 Marketing and labelling L L L L H H 3.59 4 Commodity risks
Additional material topics mandatory for disclosure:
21 Corporate governance principles H H H H H H 3 2 Corruption, reputational risks
22 Research and education H H H M H H 4 3.67 Strategic planning, regulatory, climate risks
Impact degree
High H
Medium M
Low L
Risk assessment scale
Probability
Impact 3 4 5
2 3 3
1 2 3
Impact of risks and opportunities on the business model and value chain of the Company
Stage of the business model Opportunities Risks
Development
  • Development of proprietary technologies and import substitution.
  • Introduction of new types of fertilizers offering enhanced environmental safety and improved biological availability.
  • Development of fertilizers adapted to the climate change.
  • Sanctions
  • Strategic planning
Mining
  • Development of logistics infrastructure to simplify the delivery of raw materials to processing facilities.
  • Development of conveyor lines for transporting ore from open pits to beneficiation plants.
  • Use of remotely operated machinery to improve the efficiency and safety of mining and transportation.
  • Production
  • Health and safety
  • Environmental
Fertilizer production
  • Introduction of energy efficient technologies.
  • Development of water‑saving technologies for production purposes, including the reuse of industrial waste water.
  • Automation and digitalisation of production
  • Production
  • Health and safety
  • Environmental
Application and service
  • Growing demand for fertilizers due to declining soil fertility.
  • Development of special fertilizers tailored to different climate conditions.
  • Development of educational programmes to teach customers how to use fertilizers effectively.
  • Business processes and systems
Transportation and logistics
  • Investments in digital solutions for cargo tracking.
  • Entering into long‑term contracts with port operators and carriers to reduce costs and increase logistics reliability.
  • Business processes and systems
Marketing and sales
  • Launch of educational programmes and workshops for foreign farmers, demonstrating the advantages of PhosAgro fertilizers.
  • Expanding the range of special fertilizers tailored to different regional climates.
  • Use of the ESG approach in marketing to emphasise the environmental safety of PhosAgro fertilizers.
  • Business processes and systems
  • Credit
Charitable giving and community and infrastructure development investment, RUB ‘000

GRI 203‑1

Allocations 2022 2023 2024
Contributions to charities, NGOs and research institutions (not related to the organisation’s commercial research and development) 3,083,504 802,874 2,302,684
Funds allocated to support community infrastructure (recreational facilities, etc.) 1,838,886 7,335,597 7,945,884
Direct spending on social programmes, including arts and educational activities 3,978,562 1,217,822 1,480,575
Total 8,900,952 9,356,293 11,729,143

GRI 403‑10

Employee category Main types of occupational diseases Causes
Employees Lumbosacral radiculopathy of occupational aetiology Prolonged exposure to a harmful production factor: physical exertion and functional overstrain of individual organs and systems in respective locations
Cervical radiculopathy of occupational aetiology
Reflex lumbosacral muscular‑tonic syndrome of occupational aetiology
Reflex cervical muscular‑tonic syndrome of occupational aetiology
Lumbosacral radiculopathy (vascular compression syndrome)
Persistent bilateral sensorineural hearing loss Prolonged exposure to a harmful production factor: industrial noise
Vibration syndrome Prolonged exposure to a harmful production factor: general vibration in excess of permissible exposure limits
Workers who are not employees but whose work and/or workplace are controlled by the organisation Lumbosacral radiculopathy of occupational aetiology Prolonged exposure to a harmful production factor: physical exertion and functional overstrain of individual organs and systems in respective locations
Cervical radiculopathy of occupational aetiology
Reflex cervical muscular‑tonic syndrome of occupational aetiology
Vibration syndrome Prolonged exposure to a harmful production factor: general/local vibration
Persistent bilateral sensorineural hearing loss Prolonged exposure to harmful production factors: industrial noise
Budget contributions other than income tax and excess profit tax, RUB mln

GRI 207-4

Item Group Russia Poland Switzerland France Germany Serbia Lithuania Romania Africa Brazil Singapore Cyprus Finland
2022 2023 2024 2022 2023 2024 2022 2023 2024 2022 2023 2024 2022 2023 2024 2022 2023 2024 2022 2023 2024 2022 2023 2024 2022 2023 2024 2022 2023 2024 2022 2023 2024 2022 2023 2024 2022 2023 2024 2022 2023 2024
VAT 20,425 17,700 20,181 21,650 17,700 20,181 (108) 0 0 (707) 0 0 (447) 0 0 148 0 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 (43) 0 0 (99) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0
Personal income tax (7,324) (5,508) (7,311) (7,199) (5,508) (7,311) (13) 0 0 (53) 0 0 (11) 0 0 (15) 0 0 0 0 0 (5) 0 0 0 0 0 (5) 0 0 (5) 0 0 0 0 0 (16) 0 0 (1) 0 0
Social contributions (9,902) (11,822) (14,963) (9,595) (11,822) (14,963) (14) 0 0 (238) 0 0 (21) 0 0 (4) 0 0 (1) 0 0 (5) 0 0 (7) 0 0 0 0 0 (4) 0 0 0 0 0 (12) 0 0 0 0 0
MET (8,028) (9,873) (11,944) (8,028) (9,873) (11,944) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Property tax (1,737) (2,067) (2,204) (1,737) (2,067) (2,204) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pollution fees (187) (203) (215) (187) (203) (215) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Land tax (226) (194) (324) (226) (194) (324) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Water use charges (56) (64) (82) (56) (64) (82) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Transport tax (17) (18) (20) (17) (18) (20) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Water tax (4) (5) (5) (4) (5) (5) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Regular subsoil use fees 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Other taxes (19) (22) (27) (15) (22) (27) 0 0 0 0 0 0 (1) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (3) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tax fines and penalties (8) (4) 0 (8) (4) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Unified tax account 0 (53) 36 0 (53) 36 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dividend income tax (1) (608) (591) (1) (608) (591) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Country‑by‑country reporting
Tax jurisdiction Name of the resident entities Primary activity of the organisation
Russian Federation PhosAgro, PJSC Parent company
Apatit, JSC Core production
Tirvas, LLC Social services
Gornyy tsekh, LLC Capital mining operations
Teleset, LLC Social services
Tsentr stroitelnyh materialov, LLC Repair services
Aeroport, OJSC Social services
Korporativnoe pitanie, LLC Social services
PromTransPort, LLC Transportation services
Mekhanik, LLC Repair services
PhosAgro‑Region, LLC Domestic trader
PhosAgro‑Oryol, LLC Domestic trader
PhosAgro‑Belgorod, LLC Domestic trader
PhosAgro‑Volga, LLC Domestic trader
PhosAgro‑Lipetsk, LLC Domestic trader
PhosAgro‑Kursk, LLC Domestic trader
PhosAgro‑Don, LLC Domestic trader
PhosAgro‑Kuban, LLC Domestic trader
PhosAgro‑Stavropol, LLC Domestic trader
PhosAgro‑Tambov, LLC Domestic trader
PhosAgro‑SeveroZapad, LLC Domestic trader
Smart Bulk Terminal, LLC Stevedoring services
Samoilov Scientific Research Institute for Fertilizers and Insectofungicides (NIUIF), JSC R&D
Trading House PhosAgro, LLC Trading
RBTS PhosAgro, LLC Service company
PhosAgro Engineering Centre, LLC Service company
PhosAgro‑Service, LLC Service company
PhosAgro‑Sibir, LLC Domestic trader
Tirvas Public Catering, LLC Social services
Aeroport Khibiny, LLC Social services
Brazil PhosAgro Americas (until 31.03.2022)In March 2022, the Group lost control over all of its foreign companies. Service company
Germany PhosAgro Deutschland GmbH (until 31.03.2022)In March 2022, the Group lost control over all of its foreign companies. Foreign trader
Cyprus Phosint Trading Limited Ltd (until 31.03.2022)In March 2022, the Group lost control over all of its foreign companies. Foreign trader
Phosint Ltd (until 31.03.2022)In March 2022, the Group lost control over all of its foreign companies. Holding company
Okmus Oy (until 31.03.2022)In March 2022, the Group lost control over all of its foreign companies. Holding company
Lithuania UAB PhosAgro Baltic (until 31.03.2022)In March 2022, the Group lost control over all of its foreign companies. Foreign trader
Poland PHOSAGRO POLSKA Sp.z o.o. (until 31.03.2022)In March 2022, the Group lost control over all of its foreign companies. Foreign trader
Romania PhosAgro Balkans SRL Romania (from 01.09.2020 until 31.03.2022)In March 2022, the Group lost control over all of its foreign companies. Foreign trader
Serbia PhosAgro Balkans d.o.o. Beograd (until 31.03.2022)In March 2022, the Group lost control over all of its foreign companies. Foreign trader
Singapore Phosagro Asia Pte Ltd (until 31.03.2022)In March 2022, the Group lost control over all of its foreign companies. Foreign trader
Finland Bulk Terminal Kotka Oy (until 31.03.2022)In March 2022, the Group lost control over all of its foreign companies. Service company
Logifert Oy (until 31.03.2022)In March 2022, the Group lost control over all of its foreign companies. Service company
France Phosagro France SAS (until 31.03.2022)In March 2022, the Group lost control over all of its foreign companies. Foreign trader
Switzerland PhosAgro Trading SA (until 31.03.2022)In March 2022, the Group lost control over all of its foreign companies. Foreign trader
PhosAgro Logistics AG (until 31.03.2022)In March 2022, the Group lost control over all of its foreign companies. Logistics and distribution
PhosAsset GmbH (until 31.03.2022)In March 2022, the Group lost control over all of its foreign companies. Holding company
South Africa PhosAgro South Africa Proprietary Limited (01.11.2020 until 31.03.2022)In March 2022, the Group lost control over all of its foreign companies. Foreign trader
New hires

GRI 401‑1

Region Gender 2022 2023 2024
under 30 years 30–50 years above 50 years Share, % Total under 30 years 30–50 years above 50 years Share, % Total under 30 years 30–50 years above 50 years Share, % Total
Vologda region M 405 526 107 18.06 1,038 388 601 132 20.53 1,121 352 382 34 15.71 768
F 197 354 50 10.46 601 199 350 48 10.93 597 173 277 20 9.62 470
Total 602 880 157 28.52 1,639 587 951 180 31.47 1,718 525 659 54 25.33 1,238
Saratov region M 143 310 33 8.46 486 124 292 30 8.17 446 179 308 40 10.78 527
F 65 156 26 4.30 247 67 107 12 3.41 186 67 108 21 4.01 196
Total 208 466 59 12.75 733 191 399 42 11.58 632 246 416 61 14.79 723
Leningrad region M 201 374 35 10.61 610 150 271 14 7.97 435 153 303 37 10.09 493
F 68 118 18 3.55 204 56 72 7 2.47 135 74 96 17 3.83 187
Total 269 492 53 14.16 814 206 343 21 10.44 570 227 399 54 13.91 680
Moscow M 3 20 8 0.54 31 9 27 7 0.79 43 8 28 12 0.98 48
F 3 17 2 0.38 22 8 17 1 0.48 26 9 8 2 0.39 19
Total 6 37 10 0.92 53 17 44 8 1.26 69 17 36 14 1.37 67
Murmansk region M 449 1,237 123 31.48 1,809 501 1,170 118 32.77 1,789 467 960 114 31.53 1,541
F 161 287 47 8.61 495 145 290 45 8.79 480 170 230 41 9.02 441
Total 610 1,524 170 40.09 2,304 646 1,460 163 41.56 2,269 637 1,190 155 40.55 1,982
Other M 19 98 39 2.71 156 24 69 30 2.25 123 11 92 26 2.64 129
F 13 26 9 0.84 48 12 55 11 1.43 78 14 47 8 1.41 69
Total 32 124 48 3.55 204 36 124 41 3.68 201 25 139 34 4.05 198
Men, total 1,220 2,565 345 71.86 4,130 1,196 2,430 331 72.47 3,957 1,170 2,073 263 71.73 3,506
Women, total 507 958 152 28.14 1,617 487 891 124 27.51 1,502 507 766 109 28.27 1,382
Total 1,727 3,523 497 100.00 5,747 1,683 3,321 455 100 5,459 1,677 2,839 372 100.00 4,888
Turnover%

GRI 401‑1, MED 33

Region Gender 2022 2023 2024
under 30 years 30–50 years above 50 years Total under 30 years 30–50 years above 50 years Total under 30 years 30–50 years above 50 years Total
Vologda region M 0.47 0.81 0.12 1.40 0.21 0.45 0.05 0.71 0.30 0.60 0.08 0.97
F 0.31 0.72 0.09 1.12 0.19 0.64 0.08 0.90 0.19 0.57 0.04 0.79
Total 0.79 1.53 0.21 2.52 0.39 1.09 0.13 1.62 0.49 1.16 0.11 1.77
Saratov region M 0.18 0.45 0.04 0.67 0.13 0.43 0.06 0.62 0.19 0.48 0.07 0.74
F 0.07 0.21 0.06 0.33 0.09 0.18 0.03 0.31 0.14 0.17 0.04 0.35
Total 0.25 0.66 0.10 1.00 0.22 0.61 0.09 0.93 0.33 0.65 0.11 1.09
Leningrad region M 0.38 0.72 0.10 1.20 0.28 0.60 0.05 0.93 0.26 0.59 0.06 0.92
F 0.10 0.19 0.05 0.34 0.14 0.16 0.03 0.33 0.13 0.20 0.02 0.36
Total 0.48 0.91 0.15 1.54 0.42 0.77 0.08 1.27 0.39 0.80 0.08 1.27
Moscow M 0.01 0.06 0.03 0.09 0.00 0.05 0.01 0.07 0.00 0.06 0.03 0.09
F 0.01 0.05 0.01 0.07 0.01 0.03 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.05
Total 0.01 0.11 0.04 0.15 0.01 0.09 0.01 0.11 0.00 0.11 0.03 0.14
Murmansk region M 0.69 2.18 0.22 3.09 0.61 1.83 0.23 2.68 0.63 1.80 0.27 2.70
F 0.24 0.57 0.09 0.91 0.29 0.54 0.09 0.91 0.28 0.53 0.06 0.87
Total 0.93 2.75 0.31 4.00 0.90 2.37 0.32 3.59 0.91 2.33 0.33 3.57
Other M 0.06 0.33 0.14 0.52 0.04 0.27 0.15 0.46 0.05 0.24 0.12 0.41
F 0.01 0.07 0.02 0.10 0.01 0.10 0.05 0.16 0.02 0.10 0.03 0.14
Total 0.07 0.40 0.16 0.62 0.05 0.37 0.20 0.61 0.07 0.34 0.14 0.55
Men, total 1.79 4.55 0.63 6.97 1.28 3.65 0.56 5.48 1.44 3.77 0.62 5.83
Women, total 0.74 1.81 0.32 2.87 0.72 1.65 0.28 2.65 0.75 1.62 0.19 2.55
Total 2.52 6.36 0.95 9.84 2.00 5.30 0.84 8.14 2.19 5.39 0.81 8.4
Social investmentsBoundary 2: Apatit, including its branches and standalone business units., RUB mln

GRI 401‑2, MED 28

Programme 2022 2023 2024 Δ 2024/2023, %
Financial aid to employees 72.2 98.0 109.99 12
Recreation, rehabilitation, health resort treatment, and VHI programme 506.2 586.5 824.2 41
Improvement of working conditions 390.1 509.7 489.5 –4
Corporate housing programme 88.5 112.0 150.1 34
Other social benefits and guarantees 227.1 329.7 394.96 20
Corporate and cultural events 186.4 243.4 325.1 34
Support to the trade union (special purpose funding and bonuses) 233.1 315.9 434.6 38
Total 1,703.7 2,195.2 2,728.50 24
Parental leave in the reporting year, people

GRI 401‑3

Item 2022 2023 2024
M F Total M F Total M F Total
Number of employees entitled to parental leave n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
Employees on parental leave 15 827 842 16 828 844 42 846 888
Employees who returned to work after parental leave 2 198 200 0 188 188 2 177 179
Employees who returned to work after parental leave and stayed at work 12 months after return 3 165 168 1 187 188 0 179 179
Return to work ratio 40.0 86.5 85.5 0.0 97.4 96.9 100.0 98.88 98.90
Retention ratio 100.0 93.8 93.9 50.0 94.4 94.0 0.0 95.2 95.2

List of PhosAgro Group companies

  1. PhosAgro, PJSC
  2. Kirovsk Branch of Apatit, JSC
  3. Tirvas, LLC
  4. Gorny tsekh, LLC
  5. Teleset, LLC
  6. Tsentr stroitelnyh materialov, LLC
  7. Aeroport, JSC
  8. Balakovo Branch of Apatit, JSC
  9. Korporativnoe pitanie, LLC
  10. PromTransPort, LLC
  11. Mekhanik, LLC
  12. Volkhov Branch of Apatit, JSC
  13. Apatit, JSC
  14. PhosAgro‑Region, LLC
  15. PhosAgro‑Oryol, LLC
  16. PhosAgro‑Belgorod, LLC
  17. PhosAgro‑Volga, LLC
  18. PhosAgro‑Lipetsk, LLC
  19. PhosAgro‑Kursk, LLC
  20. PhosAgro‑Don, LLC
  21. PhosAgro‑Kuban, LLC
  22. PhosAgro‑Stavropol, LLC
  23. PhosAgro‑Tambov, LLC
  24. PhosAgro‑SeveroZapad, LLC
  25. Smart Bulk Terminal, LLC
  26. NIUIF, JSC
  27. Trading House PhosAgro, LLC
  28. RBTS PhosAgro, LLC
  29. ITS PhosAgro, LLC
  30. PhosAgro‑Service, LLC
  31. PhosAgro‑Sibir, LLC
  32. Tirvas OP, LLC
  33. Khibiny Airport, LLC
Description of drivers exerting material impact on GHG emissions
Volumes Sales growth driver
Precursors Reduction in the share of internally produced ammonia and ammonium sulphate leads to a decrease in Scope 1 emissions (consumption of natural gas in production processes) and a slight decline in Scope 2 emissions (energy consumption in production processes). Replacement of proprietary precursors with purchased ones results in an increase in Scope 3 emissions from purchased goods.
Energy Smaller share of internally generated energy leads to a reduction in Scope 1 GHG emissions from combustion of natural gas, while also boosting Scope 2 emissions from purchased power.
Gas consumption rates Lower gas consumption rates in ammonia production (including overhaul shutdowns).
GHG in feedstock Changes in GHG emissions per unit of purchased goods. Changes in the structure and consumption rates of purchased feedstock, including the substitution of certain types of raw materials with others.
Other products Inclusion of tolling products in the GHG Emission Report.